• Focus Areas
    • Cause Selection
    • Global Health & Wellbeing
      • Farm Animal Welfare
      • Global Aid Policy
      • Global Health & Development
      • Scientific Research
      • South Asian Air Quality
    • Longtermism
      • Biosecurity & Pandemic Preparedness
      • Effective Altruism Community Growth
      • Potential Risks from Advanced AI
    • Other Areas
      • Criminal Justice Reform
      • History of Philanthropy
      • Immigration Policy
      • Land Use Reform
      • Macroeconomic Stabilization Policy
  • Grants
  • Research & Updates
    • Research Reports
    • Blog Posts
    • Notable Lessons
    • In the News
  • About Us
    • Grantmaking Process
    • How to Apply for Funding
    • Team
    • Get Email Updates
  • We’re hiring!
  • Focus Areas
    • Cause Selection
    • Global Health & Wellbeing
      • Farm Animal Welfare
      • Global Aid Policy
      • Global Health & Development
      • Scientific Research
      • South Asian Air Quality
    • Longtermism
      • Biosecurity & Pandemic Preparedness
      • Effective Altruism Community Growth
      • Potential Risks from Advanced AI
    • Other Areas
      • Criminal Justice Reform
      • History of Philanthropy
      • Immigration Policy
      • Land Use Reform
      • Macroeconomic Stabilization Policy
  • Grants
  • Research & Updates
    • Research Reports
    • Blog Posts
    • Notable Lessons
    • In the News
  • About Us
    • Grantmaking Process
    • How to Apply for Funding
    • Team
    • Get Email Updates
  • We’re hiring!

Maybe the Murder Rate Levelled Off This Year?

  • Focus Area: Criminal Justice Reform
  • Content Type: Blog Posts

Table of Contents

    Published: September 26, 2016 | by David Roodman

    In February, out of concern that the US is experiencing a new crime wave, I blogged about a data set Open Phil assembled on crime in major American cities. In comparison with the FBI’s widely cited national totals, our data covered far less territory—18 cities for which we found daily incident data—but did better in the time dimension, with higher resolution and more up-to-date counts. We could compute daily totals, and from data sets that for many cities are almost literally up-to-the-minute.

    Some places that have recently made national crime news also appear in our data, including Baltimore, Chicago, St. Louis, and Washington, DC. Within our geographic scope, we gain a better view into the latest trends than we can get from the FBI’s annual totals, which appear with a long lag.

    Indeed the FBI will probably release its 2015 crime totals in the next few days, which may stoke discussion about crime in the US. [Update: it just did].

    In this post, I update all the graphs presented in the earlier one, which I suggest you read first. These updates generate predictions about what the FBI will announce, and perhaps point to one trend that it won’t yet discern.

    With 8 more months of data on these 18 cities, plus the addition of New York for 2006–15, the main updates on per-capita crime rates are:

    • On a population-weighted basis, the hints in the old post of decline at the end of 2015, in violent crime in general and homicide in particular, have faded—or at least have been pushed forward in time.
    • Instead, after the homicide rise of late 2014 and 2015—which indeed was one of the largest increases in modern times—the homicide trend has flattened.
    • Violent crime rose slowly, as it has since mid-2014. It remains low historically, down roughly a third since 2001.
    • Property crime (burglary, theft, arson) continues to sink like a stone.

    If our data capture national trends (which is far from certain), then the FBI will soon report that the 2015 homicide rate rose a lot from 2014, that violent crime rose a little bit, that property crime fell, and that total crime, which is dominated in sheer quantity by property crime, also fell. [Update: these look right.]

    Here are the Open Phil graphs, updated through a few weeks ago and starting with homicide (data and code here):

    Homicide-pop.png

    Cleansed of seasonal cycles, the homicide rate rose from mid-2014 to mid-2015. (The tick marks on the time axis indicate January 1 of each year.) However, since 2015, the seasonally adjusted homicide rate appears to have held steady. Possibly the elevated level—still low by the standard of recent history—is the new normal. Possibly the rate has peaked and will fall again, as cities such as Chicago and Baltimore successfully wrestle with local crime outbreaks. Or perhaps the rise will resume. Time will tell.

    Here are the underlying trends by city–smoothed and seasonally adjusted. The curves are more volatile in smaller cities, where homicide is rarer in absolute terms:
    Homicide-smoothed.png

    In the FBI typology, the other kinds of violent crime are rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. (Robbery is violent because it is forcible theft from a person. “Aggravated” means “intended to inflict severe bodily harm,” usually through use of a weapon.) We have left out rape because the FBI broadened its definition in 2013, potentially creating spurious statistical shifts. Adding in robbery and aggravated assault gives this graph:

    ViolentNonRape-pop.png

    It appears that after falling about 40% since 2001, violent crime per capita has risen slightly since mid-2014.

    The story looks different for the other major component of the FBI’s headline crime tally. Property crime is still falling in our sample:

    Property-pop.png

    Here are graphs for other subcategories of crime, including ones breaking out by gun involvement. As the February post explains, changing the crime category also changes the sample, because we could not obtain data for all categories from all our cities. In general, crimes involving guns rose more or fell less than those not:

    HomicideFireArm-pop.png

    HomicideNonFireArm-pop.png

    AggAssault-pop.png

    AggAssaultFireArm-pop.png

    AggAssaultNonFireArm-pop.png

    Robbery-pop.png

    RobberyFireArm-pop.png

    RobberyNonFireArm-pop.png

    Related Items

    • Criminal Justice Reform

      Vox: A criminal justice expert’s guide to donating effectively

      Chloe Cockburn’s job is finding and funding the highest-impact groups working on criminal justice. Here are her top picks.

      Read more
    • Criminal Justice Reform

      Inside Philanthropy: With More Donors, Open Philanthropy is Spinning Its Criminal Justice Reform Work into a New Fund

      This week, Open Philanthropy announced the closure of this program and the corresponding launch of an independent organization—Just Impact Advisors—with $50 million in seed funding provided by Open...

      Read more
    • Criminal Justice Reform

      Our Criminal Justice Reform Program Is Now an Independent Organization: Just Impact

      Today, we’re making three announcements: After hundreds of grants totaling more than $130 million over six years, one of our first programs -- criminal justice reform (CJR) --...

      Read more
    Back to Research & Updates
    Open Philanthropy
    Open Philanthropy
    • Careers
    • Press Kit
    • Governance
    • Privacy Policy
    Mailing Address
    182 Howard Street #225
    San Francisco, CA 94105
    Email
    [email protected]
    Media Inquiries
    [email protected]
    Anonymous Feedback
    Feedback Form

    Sign Up to Follow Our Work

    Join Our Mailing List

    © Open Philanthropy 2022